Canonical Classics ← 第三十回
第三十回
xiéqīnzhèng
xīnyuán

The Evil Demon Assaults the True Dharma · The Horse of the Will Recalls the Monkey of the Heart

沙僧為證
模式 Mode Read Study
拼音 Pinyin Off
字體 Script
原文 Original text 繁體 Traditional Reader's edition

沙僧為證 Sha Wujing Named as Witness

gōngzhǔdào:「lángjūnchàguàilechángyǒushénshū?」lǎoguàidào:「háiqiángzuǐlixiànzhùduìtóuzàiquèshìzhèngjiàn?」gōngzhǔdào:「shìshuí?」lǎoyāodào:「shìtángsēngèrshāshàng。」yuánláiréndàolechùshuíkěnrènzhǐfànglàigōngzhǔdào:「lángjūnqiěwènshēngguǒrányǒushūjiùlegānxīnjiǎruòshūquèwǎngshāle?」gōngzhǔdào:「lángjūnchàguàilechángyǒushénshū?」lǎoguàidào:「háiqiángzuǐlixiànzhùduìtóuzàiquèshìzhèngjiàn?」gōngzhǔdào:「shìshuí?」lǎoyāodào:「shìtángsēngèrshāshàng。」yuánláiréndàolechùshuíkěnrènzhǐfànglàigōngzhǔdào:「lángjūnqiěwènshēngguǒrányǒushūjiùlegānxīnjiǎruòshūquèwǎngshāle?」


逐句解 Line by line

gōngzhǔdào:「lángjūnchàguàilechángyǒushénshū?」 gōngzhǔdào:「lángjūnchàguàilechángyǒushénshū?」

The princess said: "My lord, you wrong me with your blame — when did I ever send any such letter?"

差怪 is to blame someone mistakenly ( in the sense "amiss, in error"). 何嘗 is the rhetorical "when ever?"; and 甚書 stands for 甚麼書 ("what letter"), with read shén in its interrogative sense.

lǎoguàidào:「háiqiángzuǐlixiànzhùduìtóuzàiquèshìzhèngjiàn?」 lǎoguàidào:「háiqiángzuǐlixiànzhùduìtóuzàiquèshìzhèngjiàn?」

The old demon said: "Still you talk back! I have one of the very adversaries seized and held right here — is that not proof enough?"

強嘴 is to answer back stubbornly, to be obstinate of tongue ( read qiáng); is again hái ("still"). 對頭 is the "opposing party, adversary," and 證見 the "witness" or "proof."

gōngzhǔdào:「shìshuí?」lǎoyāodào:「shìtángsēngèrshāshàng。」 gōngzhǔdào:「shìshuí?」lǎoyāodào:「shìtángsēngèrshāshàng。」

"Who?" asked the princess. "It is Sha the Monk," said the old fiend, "Tripitaka’s second disciple."

沙和尚 — Sha Wujing (沙悟淨), the third to join the pilgrimage but here reckoned "second disciple" after Wukong, Bajie having his own standing. He is the "adversary" now to be produced as living evidence against the princess.

yuánláiréndàolechùshuíkěnrènzhǐfànglài yuánláiréndàolechùshuíkěnrènzhǐfànglài

Now when a person is brought to the very brink of death, who will confess to a capital crime? She could only stall him with flat denial.

A narratorial aside offering a worldly maxim: 認死 is to own to a death-deserving offence; 放賴 is to brazen it out, to stall with bald denial. 只得 takes as ("could only, had no choice but"). The narrator excuses her lie as the reflex of the condemned.

gōngzhǔdào:「lángjūnqiěwènshēng gōngzhǔdào:「lángjūnqiěwènshēng

The princess said: "My lord, quell your anger a moment; you and I will go and put the question to him."

息怒: to still one’s wrath. Her proposal is a shrewd gamble — to confront the witness directly, staking everything on the guess that the monk will not betray her.

guǒrányǒushūjiùlegānxīnjiǎruòshūquèwǎngshāle?」 guǒrányǒushūjiùlegānxīnjiǎruòshūquèwǎngshāle?」

"If there truly was a letter, then beat me to death and I shall die content; but if there was none — would you not have slain your own handmaid for nothing?"

奴奴 is a woman’s abject self-reference, "this slave, this handmaid of yours" — a rhetorical retreat from the earlier warm 郎君 into pure supplication. The gambit is calculated: she frames her life as the stake, trusting the monk’s silence to save her.


總評 Commentary

The narrator intervenes with a proverbial generalization — that no one at the point of death will confess to a capital charge — which reframes the princess’s deceit not as villainy but as the universal instinct of the doomed. It is a characteristic move of the vernacular narrator, who moralizes and sympathizes in the same stroke.

Her proposal to have Sha Wujing questioned is the hinge of the whole sequence. She stakes her life on the monk’s discretion, and in doing so hands the decision to him — setting up the passage to come, in which Sha chooses to shield her at the apparent cost of his own life.

The shift in her self-naming, from 郎君 (addressing him) to 奴奴 (naming herself), charts her rhetorical descent from a wife’s standing to a suppliant’s, measuring how completely the ground has given way beneath her.