Canonical Classics ← 第八十五回
第八十五回
xīnyuán
zhǔtūnchán

The Mind-Ape Envies the Wood Mother · The Fiend Lord Plots to Swallow the Chan

禪性遭魔
模式 Mode Read Study
拼音 Pinyin Off
字體 Script
原文 Original text 繁體 Traditional Reader's edition 含詞賦 With rhapsody

禪性遭魔 The Chan Nature Meets the Demon

shīdiūletuōledèngbèiyāojīngzhènfēngjìngshèleliánzhèzhèngshìshīdiūletuōledèngbèiyāojīngzhènfēngjìngshèleliánzhèzhèngshì

chánxìngzāonánzhèngguǒjiāngliúyòuzāixīngchánxìngzāonánzhèngguǒjiāngliúyòuzāixīng

逐句解 Line by line

shīdiūletuōledèngbèiyāojīngzhènfēngjìngshèle shīdiūletuōledèngbèiyāojīngzhènfēngjìngshèle

The master lost the horse, came out of the stirrups, and was carried straight off by the fiend on a gust of wind.

Three verbs of losing in nineteen characters: the horse gone, the stirrups gone, the man gone. is the stirrup. is to take up and carry off by force, the word this novel keeps for abductions by air.

liánzhèzhèngshì liánzhèzhèngshì

The pity of it! This is just the case:

A bare exclamation with its own mark, standing in front of the verse cue and set here as one segment with it, because the two belong to the same breath. 可憐 is the narrator, not a character — the storyteller letting the audience know how to feel before the two lines land.

chánxìngzāonánzhèngguǒjiāngliúyòuzāixīng chánxìngzāonánzhèngguǒjiāngliúyòuzāixīng

The Chan nature meets the demon and the true fruit is hard to win; the River Float runs again upon a bitter star of calamity.

禪性, the Chan nature, is the master in the language of the chapter title — the same the fiend lord plots to swallow. 江流, River Float, is Tripitaka's own childhood name: he was set adrift on a river as an infant and named for it. 正果 is the true fruit, the attainment the whole journey is for. 災星, a star of calamity, puts the disaster down to fate in the old astrological sense.


總評 Commentary

The two closing lines name him twice and neither name is Tripitaka. He is the Chan nature and he is the River Float — the doctrine and the orphan, the thing the journey is about and the child who was put in the water.

It also frames the abduction as recurrence rather than accident. Again, says the second line. This has happened before and the pattern is older than the plan that caught him.