Canonical Classics ← 第二十五回
第二十五回
zhènyuánxiāngǎnzhuōjīngsēng
sūnxíngzhěnàozhuāngguàn

The Immortal Zhenyuan Pursues and Seizes the Scripture-Seeking Monk · Sun the Pilgrim Makes Great Havoc at the Five-Villages Abbey

埋怨番禍
模式 Mode Read Study
拼音 Pinyin Off
字體 Script
原文 Original text 繁體 Traditional Reader's edition

埋怨番禍 Sanzang Rebukes the Pilgrim

tángsēngmányuànxíngzhědào:「zhèhóutóufānfānzhuànghuòtōuchīledeguǒzijiùshòuxiēerràng便biànlezěnmeyòutuīdǎodeshùruòlùnzhèbānqíngyóugàozhuàngláijiùshìlǎozizuòguānshuōtōng。」tángsēngmányuànxíngzhědào:「zhèhóutóufānfānzhuànghuòtōuchīledeguǒzijiùshòuxiēerràng便biànlezěnmeyòutuīdǎodeshùruòlùnzhèbānqíngyóugàozhuàngláijiùshìlǎozizuòguānshuōtōng。」


逐句解 Line by line

tángsēngmányuànxíngzhědào:「zhèhóutóufānfānzhuànghuò tángsēngmányuànxíngzhědào:「zhèhóutóufānfānzhuànghuò

The Tang Monk reproached the Pilgrim: "You monkey-head, time and again you stir up disaster!

埋怨 (mányuàn) "to reproach, blame." 猴頭 (hóu tóu) "monkey-head," a scolding epithet. 番番撞禍 (fānfān zhuàng huò) "again and again to blunder into calamity."

tōuchīledeguǒzijiùshòuxiēerràng便biànlezěnmeyòutuīdǎodeshù tōuchīledeguǒzijiùshòuxiēerràng便biànlezěnmeyòutuīdǎodeshù

"You stole and ate his fruit, and took some abuse for it—had you let him curse a few times, that would have been the end of it; but why must you go and topple his tree besides?

氣兒 (qìr) "a spell of abuse," with the suffix 兒 (er). 推倒 (tuī dǎo) "to push over, topple," 倒 (dǎo)—the master singles out the graver offence.

ruòlùnzhèbānqíngyóugàozhuàngláijiùshìlǎozizuòguānshuōtōng。」 ruòlùnzhèbānqíngyóugàozhuàngláijiùshìlǎozizuòguānshuōtōng。」

"If one weighed up the whole affair, and a suit were brought against us, then even were your own father the presiding official, there would be no talking it away."

情由 (qíngyóu) "the circumstances, the whole affair." 告起狀來 (gào qǐ zhuàng lái) "to lodge a lawsuit." 你老子做官 (nǐ lǎozi zuò guān) "were your father the magistrate"—老子 (lǎozi) "father," 子 (zi) the suffix.


總評 Commentary

The escape sequence opens with Tang Sanzang's rebuke, which draws the moral distinction the whole chapter turns on: eating the fruit and enduring the boys' abuse was a bounded, forgivable trespass, but felling the tree is an act no plea could excuse. The master frames it in legal terms—a "lawsuit" that not even a father-magistrate could argue away.