鬧我幽冥 Before The Lords Of Darkness
陰君近前擋住道:「大聖有何事,鬧我幽冥?」這大聖道:「我因保唐僧西天取經,路過西梁國,至一山,有強賊截劫我師。是老孫打死幾個,師父怪我,把我逐回。我隨到南海菩薩處訴告,不知那妖精怎麼就綽著口氣,假變作我的模樣,在半路上打倒師父,搶奪了行李。阴君近前挡住道:「大圣有何事,闹我幽冥?」这大圣道:「我因保唐僧西天取经,路过西梁国,至一山,有强贼截劫我师。是老孙打死几个,师父怪我,把我逐回。我随到南海菩萨处诉告,不知那妖精怎么就绰着口气,假变作我的模样,在半路上打倒师父,抢夺了行李。
逐句解 Line by line
The Lords of Darkness came forward and barred the way: "Great Sage, what business have you, to make this uproar in our realm of shades?"
陰君, the Lords of Darkness, is the collective name for the Ten Kings. Their question is the gate-guards' question all over again — what is this disturbance — and not a question about identity.
This Great Sage said: "Because I was guarding the Tang Monk on his way west to fetch scriptures, we passed through the Kingdom of Western Liang and came to a mountain, where fierce bandits waylaid and robbed my master.
強賊 takes qiáng, fierce. 西梁國 is the Kingdom of Women from chapters fifty-three and fifty-four; the recital now dates itself by its route, which is what you do when you are giving evidence to a court that keeps files.
Old Sun killed several of them; my master blamed me, and drove me back.
Fifteen characters for the event the whole chapter proceeds from, and Wukong states it without a word in his own defence.
I went thereupon to the Bodhisattva in the Southern Sea to lay my complaint. I do not know how this fiend then snatched up the drift of my words, falsely changed himself into my likeness, struck my master down on the road and made off with the luggage.
綽著口氣: 綽 is chāo, to snatch something up — the automatic reading gives chuò — with 著 as zhe keeping the action running. The fiend caught the drift of Wukong's grievance out of the air and built the substitution out of it. 打倒 takes dǎo.
This is the fourth full recital of the chapter's events and the first to be dated by geography — 路過西梁國,至一山, we passed through the Kingdom of Western Liang and came to a mountain. Wukong is building a record for a court that keeps records, and the change of style fits the venue.
綽著口氣 is the most interesting phrase in the passage and the only new theory anybody has offered about the imposture. The suggestion is that the fiend caught the drift of Wukong's complaint — overheard the grievance, took its measure — and built the substitution out of it. It is a guess, prefaced with 不知, I do not know, and nobody follows it up.
It is also, as theories go, uncomfortably close to right. Whatever the false Pilgrim turns out to be, he did appear at precisely the moment Wukong was expelled and aggrieved, and he did step into exactly the role Wukong had been forced out of. The chapter keeps putting the solution in its characters' mouths and letting them treat it as speculation.