第十二回
唐王秉誠修大會
觀音顯聖化金蟬
The Tang King, Sincere in Faith, Convenes the Grand Assembly · Guanyin, Manifesting Her Holy Form, Transforms the Golden Cicada
原文 Original text
繁體 Traditional
Reader's edition
擒僧見帝
The Mendicants Before the Throne
正講處,有那司香巡堂官急奏唐王道:「法師正講談妙法,被兩個疥癩遊僧扯下來亂說胡話。」王令擒來。只見許多人將二僧推擁進後法堂,見了太宗,那僧人手也不起,拜也不拜,仰面道:「陛下問我何事?」唐王卻認得他,道:「你是前日送袈裟的和尚?」菩薩道:「正是。」太宗道:「你既來此處聽講,只該吃些齋便了,為何與我法師亂講,擾亂經堂,誤我佛事?」正讲处,有那司香巡堂官急奏唐王道:「法师正讲谈妙法,被两个疥癞游僧扯下来乱说胡话。」王令擒来。只见许多人将二僧推拥进后法堂,见了太宗,那僧人手也不起,拜也不拜,仰面道:「陛下问我何事?」唐王却认得他,道:「你是前日送袈裟的和尚?」菩萨道:「正是。」太宗道:「你既来此处听讲,只该吃些斋便了,为何与我法师乱讲,扰乱经堂,误我佛事?」
逐句解 Line by line
正講處,有那司香巡堂官急奏唐王道:「法師正講談妙法,被兩個疥癩遊僧扯下來亂說胡話。」
正讲处,有那司香巡堂官急奏唐王道:「法师正讲谈妙法,被两个疥癞游僧扯下来乱说胡话。」
Even as he was expounding, an incense-officer on hall-patrol hurriedly reported to the Tang king: 'The Master was just expounding the wondrous Law when two scabby wandering monks pulled him down and are talking wild nonsense.'
那 in 那司香巡堂官 is demonstrative nà; 正講 ('was just expounding') reads 正 as zhèng. The disturbance is reported as an outrage — the very opposite of its true significance.
王令擒來。只見許多人將二僧推擁進後法堂,見了太宗,那僧人手也不起,拜也不拜,仰面道:「陛下問我何事?」
王令擒来。只见许多人将二僧推拥进后法堂,见了太宗,那僧人手也不起,拜也不拜,仰面道:「陛下问我何事?」
The king ordered them seized. Many men came shoving and hauling the two monks into the rear dharma-hall; and seeing Taizong, those monks neither raised their hands nor bowed, but looking up said: 'What does Your Majesty ask of us?'
將 in 將二僧 is the disposal jiāng; 那 in 那僧人 is demonstrative nà. Their refusal to bow — as before the throne earlier — again betrays their more-than-mortal rank.
唐王卻認得他,道:「你是前日送袈裟的和尚?」菩薩道:「正是。」
唐王却认得他,道:「你是前日送袈裟的和尚?」菩萨道:「正是。」
The Tang king, recognizing him, said: 'Are you not the monk who presented the cassock the other day?' The Bodhisattva said: 'The very one.'
得 in 認得 ('recognizing') is the resultative de. Taizong's recognition connects the disturbance to the earlier gift.
太宗道:「你既來此處聽講,只該吃些齋便了,為何與我法師亂講,擾亂經堂,誤我佛事?」
太宗道:「你既来此处听讲,只该吃些斋便了,为何与我法师乱讲,扰乱经堂,误我佛事?」
Taizong said: 'Since you came here to hear the exposition, you had only to eat some of the vegetarian fare and be done; why do you quarrel with my Master, disturb the scripture-hall, and spoil my Buddhist service?'
為 in 為何 ('why') is wèi; 佛事 takes the global 佛 fó. The emperor, not yet understanding, treats the interruption as mere impiety.
總評 Commentary
The confrontation is staged as a scandal before it is revealed as a revelation. To the incense-officer and the emperor, two ragged mendicants have assaulted the presiding master and disrupted a solemn rite; Taizong's reproach treats the interruption as simple impiety. The dramatic irony is sustained by the monks' bearing — they will not bow, and answer the emperor with cool directness — which reads as insolence to the court but signals to the reader their divine standing. The scene delays the disclosure just long enough to let the emperor's misunderstanding stand out against the truth the next exchange will begin to reveal.