商議昧賴 A Plan to Deny It
三藏道:「這等也說得是,你且莫嚷,等我問他們看。果若是偷了,教他賠你。」明月道:「賠呀!就有錢那裡去買?」三藏道:「縱有錢沒處買啊,常言道:『仁義值千金。』教他賠你個禮,便罷了。也還不知是他不是他哩。」明月道:「怎的不是他?他那裡分不均,還在那裡嚷哩。」三藏叫聲:「徒弟,且都來。」沙僧聽見道:「不好了,決撒了。老師父叫我們,小道童胡廝罵,不是舊話兒走了風,卻是甚的?」行者道:「活羞殺人。這個不過是飲食之類,若說出來,就是我們偷嘴了,只是莫認。」八戒道:「正是,正是,昧了罷。」他三人只得出了廚房,走上殿去。畢竟不知怎麼與他抵賴,且聽下回分解。三藏道:「这等也说得是,你且莫嚷,等我问他们看。果若是偷了,教他赔你。」明月道:「赔呀!就有钱那里去买?」三藏道:「纵有钱没处买啊,常言道:『仁义值千金。』教他赔你个礼,便罢了。也还不知是他不是他哩。」明月道:「怎的不是他?他那里分不均,还在那里嚷哩。」三藏叫声:「徒弟,且都来。」沙僧听见道:「不好了,决撒了。老师父叫我们,小道童胡厮骂,不是旧话儿走了风,却是甚的?」行者道:「活羞杀人。这个不过是饮食之类,若说出来,就是我们偷嘴了,只是莫认。」八戒道:「正是,正是,昧了罢。」他三人只得出了厨房,走上殿去。毕竟不知怎么与他抵赖,且听下回分解。
逐句解 Line by line
The Tang Monk said, "There is something in what you say. Stop your shouting a moment, and let me question them.
Tripiṭaka concedes the point at once, which is characteristic and also, in the circumstances, unwise. 說得是 takes the light de.
If they did steal it, I will have them make it good to you."
教他賠你 takes the causative 教, jiào — "I will have them make it good."
Bright-Moon said, "Make it good!
And Bright-Moon's incredulity is entirely justified.
Where would there be any to buy, even with money?"
Where would you buy one? Here 那裡 is nǎ lǐ, the interrogative. The fruit is not expensive; it is unpurchasable, and the offer of restitution is meaningless.
The Tang Monk said, "Even with money and no place to buy it — the old saying has it, 'Right conduct is worth a thousand in gold.'
仁義值千金, "right conduct is worth a thousand in gold." Tripiṭaka's instinct under pressure is to reach for a maxim, and the maxim he reaches for is Confucian rather than Buddhist — the novel's three teachings sit in one another's pockets throughout.
Let them make you an apology, and let that end it.
賠個禮, péi gè lǐ, to offer an apology — a pun on the 賠 of "compensate" two lines above. If you cannot repay the thing, repay the courtesy.
And it is not yet even known whether it was they or not."
And a last, hopeful qualification: we do not actually know it was them.
Bright-Moon said, "How could it not be them?
Bright-Moon does know.
Over there they're squabbling that the shares aren't even, still bawling away."
And here is how he knows, and it is perfect: they are next door squabbling about the split. 分不均 takes 分 as fēn, the verb "to divide." Here 那裡 is the demonstrative nà lǐ, "over there" — the interrogative reading appeared five lines ago, so the two sit close together for comparison.
The Tang Monk called out: "Disciples — all of you, come here."
Tripiṭaka calls his disciples, in good faith, to clear their names.
Sha Monk heard and said, "This is bad — the game's up.
決撒了, jué sā le — vernacular for "it's blown, the game is up," with 撒 as sā. Sha Monk works out what has happened before either of the others does.
The old Master calls us, and the little Daoist boys are cursing all round — if the old business hasn't leaked, what else is it?"
走了風, "the wind got out" — the leak Bājiè warned Pilgrim about before the theft, now sprung by Bājiè. 舊話兒, "the old business," takes the er suffix; 甚的 takes 甚 as shén.
Pilgrim said, "Mortifying, this.
活羞殺人, huó xiū shā rén, "shames a man to death" — 殺 as an intensifier rather than a verb, the construction of 笑殺人, "kills one laughing."
This is only a matter of eating and drinking; but if it comes out, we'll be branded as filchers — so simply deny it."
And this is the chapter's moral hinge, delivered in a single shrug. It was only food; if we admit it we'll be branded as filchers; so deny it. Pilgrim, who has faced down the massed armies of Heaven, cannot face being thought petty, and chooses to lie about a fruit. 偷嘴, tōu zuǐ, is precisely the small domestic word for snitching food from a kitchen — the pettiness is in the vocabulary.
Bajie said, "Just so, just so — deny it and be done."
昧了罷 — 昧, mèi, to keep dark, to disavow. The 罷 is the soft particle ba that turns an instruction into a suggestion, not the bà of "enough."
So the three of them could only leave the kitchen and go up to the hall.
只得, they had no choice — which is not true. They had one.
In the end there is no telling how they will brazen it out — so listen to the telling of the next chapter.
畢竟不知…且聽下回分解 is the storyteller's formula that closes every chapter of the novel: "in the end there is no telling — listen to the next instalment." It preserves the rhythm of the marketplace performances the written novel grew out of, where the teller stopped at the tense moment and passed the bowl round. 抵賴, dǐ lài, to flatly deny. Chapter 24 is one of the minority that ends without a closing couplet: the narrator goes straight from the three of them walking up to the hall to the formula.
Tripiṭaka tries to broker a settlement, and it fails on its own terms. He offers to have the thieves make restitution; Bright-Moon points out that the fruit cannot be bought at any price. So the monk falls back on principle — right conduct is worth a thousand in gold, let them apologise and let that be an end of it — reaching, under pressure, for a Confucian maxim rather than a Buddhist one, in the way this novel's three teachings constantly borrow from each other.
But the boys have them cold, and the detail by which they have them is perfect: the culprits are next door arguing about the split. When the disciples are summoned, Sha Monk works it out first — the game's up — and then comes the chapter's moral hinge, in one shrug from Pilgrim. It was only food; if we admit it we'll be called filchers; so deny it. The word he uses, 偷嘴, is the small domestic term for snitching from a kitchen, and the pettiness is the point: the Great Sage who fought the armies of Heaven cannot bear to be thought a pilferer, and so he lies.
Bājiè agrees at once, and the three go up to the hall to brazen it out. The chapter ends without a closing couplet — straight from the walk to the hall into the storyteller's formula, which halts the tale at the tense moment and passes the bowl round. What waits in chapter 25 is Zhènyuán coming home.