拿賊拿贓 To Catch a Thief, Catch the Loot
常言道:『拿賊拿贓。』那怪物做了三年皇帝,又不曾走了馬腳,漏了風聲。他與三宮妃后同眠,又和兩班文武共樂,我老孫就有本事拿住他,也不好定個罪名。」唐僧道:「怎麼不好定罪?」行者道:「他就是個沒嘴的葫蘆,也與你滾上幾滾。他敢道:『我是烏雞國王,有甚逆天之事,你來拿我?』將甚執照與他折辯?」常言道:『拿贼拿赃。』那怪物做了三年皇帝,又不曾走了马脚,漏了风声。他与三宫妃后同眠,又和两班文武共乐,我老孙就有本事拿住他,也不好定个罪名。」唐僧道:「怎么不好定罪?」行者道:「他就是个没嘴的葫芦,也与你滚上几滚。他敢道:『我是乌鸡国王,有甚逆天之事,你来拿我?』将甚执照与他折辩?」
逐句解 Line by line
As the common saying goes: 'To catch a thief, catch him with the loot.'
拿賊拿贓: 'seize a thief, seize the stolen goods' — a proverb of procedure: a charge needs material proof.
That fiend has played emperor for three years now, and has never once shown a horse's hoof or let slip a whisper of the truth.
走馬腳: to 'show a horse's hoof,' i.e. betray the secret (cf. 露馬腳). 漏風聲: to let the wind of it leak out. 那 = nà.
He shares his bed with the consorts of the three palaces and takes his pleasure with the two files of civil and military officers; even if old Sun had the skill to seize him, it would be no easy thing to fix a charge on him.'
三宮妃后…兩班文武: the palace consorts and the ranks of officials — the demon is embedded in every relation of the realm. 和 = hé; 共樂 keeps 樂 = lè (joy); 不好 = 'not easy.'
The Tang Monk said: 'Why should it be hard to charge him with a crime?'
Tripitaka's plain challenge: the crime is obvious, so why the difficulty?
The Pilgrim said: 'Even were he a mouthless gourd, he would still roll a few rolls against you.'
沒嘴的葫蘆: 'a mouthless gourd' — proverbial for one with nothing to say; yet even so, Wukong warns, the demon would 'roll a few rolls,' i.e. put up a defense. 滾上幾滾: to wriggle, roll about.
He would dare to say: "I am the king of Wuji — what crime against Heaven have I committed, that you come to seize me?"
The imagined defense: the demon, secure on the throne, would demand the charge against him. 有甚 = shén ('what').
And with what warrant would you argue him down?'
執照: a warrant, a license. 將甚執照: with what warrant (將 = jiāng, 'with'; 甚 = shén). 折辯: to argue down, refute.
Wukong's legal scruple is here fully argued. His premise is the proverb 拿賊拿贓 — a thief must be caught with the loot — and his difficulty is that the demon's three-year reign has left no seam: no betraying 'horse's hoof,' no leaked whisper, and a place at the center of every relation of the realm, from the royal bed to the ranks of officials.
The comedy lies in the Monkey King's imagined cross-examination. The demon, though 'a mouthless gourd,' would still 'roll a few rolls' — mount a defense — and would demand, from the throne, to know the charge against him. Without a warrant (執照) or a body of evidence, Wukong foresees, the seizure would collapse into an unwinnable argument.
The passage crystallizes the chapter's turn from force to proof. The demon cannot be simply overpowered and denounced; his usurpation must be documented. This is why the drowned king's body must be recovered — the corpus delicti that will convert Wukong's certainty into a prosecutable case — and the plan he unfolds next follows directly from this juridical need.