拿賊拿贓 To Catch a Thief, Catch the Loot
常言道:『拿賊拿贓。』那怪物做了三年皇帝,又不曾走了馬腳,漏了風聲。他與三宮妃后同眠,又和兩班文武共樂,我老孫就有本事拿住他,也不好定個罪名。」唐僧道:「怎麼不好定罪?」行者道:「他就是個沒嘴的葫蘆,也與你滾上幾滾。他敢道:『我是烏雞國王,有甚逆天之事,你來拿我?』將甚執照與他折辯?」常言道:『拿贼拿赃。』那怪物做了三年皇帝,又不曾走了马脚,漏了风声。他与三宫妃后同眠,又和两班文武共乐,我老孙就有本事拿住他,也不好定个罪名。」唐僧道:「怎么不好定罪?」行者道:「他就是个没嘴的葫芦,也与你滚上几滚。他敢道:『我是乌鸡国王,有甚逆天之事,你来拿我?』将甚执照与他折辩?」
逐句解 Line by line
As the common saying goes: 'To catch a thief, catch him with the loot.'
拿賊拿贓 — 'catch the thief, catch the goods.' It is a proverb about procedure and it is still current: an accusation needs material proof behind it. The edition marks it as a quotation, which is why it stays prose however neatly it scans.
That fiend has played emperor for three years now, and has never once shown a horse's hoof or let slip a whisper of the truth.
走了馬腳: to 'show a horse's hoof' is a variant of the commoner 露馬腳 — to let the horse's foot show from under the costume, and so give the game away. It is exactly the English 'let the cat out of the bag,' and it is alive in Chinese today. 漏了風聲: to let word leak out on the wind. 那 = nà. Three years and not a single slip.
He shares his bed with the consorts of the three palaces and takes his pleasure with the two files of civil and military officers; even if old Sun had the skill to seize him, it would be no easy thing to fix a charge on him.'
The demon is not merely on the throne, he is woven into every relation in the kingdom. 三宮妃后 are the consorts of the three palaces; 兩班文武, the two files of civil and military officers who stand facing each other at court. He sleeps with the one and drinks with the other. 和 = hé; 共樂 keeps 樂 at lè, 'pleasure,' not yuè, 'music'; 不好 here means 'not easy.'
The Tang Monk said: 'Why should it be hard to charge him with a crime?'
Tripitaka's challenge again: the crime is obvious, so what is the problem?
The Pilgrim said: 'Even were he a mouthless gourd, he would still roll a few rolls against you.'
沒嘴的葫蘆, 'a mouthless gourd,' is proverbially someone with nothing to say for themselves. Even so, Wukong warns, this one would 滾上幾滾 — roll about a few turns, wriggle, put up a defense. The image is of trying to pin down a gourd that will not stay still.
He would dare to say: "I am the king of Wuji — what crime against Heaven have I committed, that you come to seize me?"
The imagined cross-examination. Sitting on the throne, the demon simply asks what he is charged with — and he has a point. 有甚: 甚 = shén, 'what.'
And with what warrant would you argue him down?'
執照 is a warrant or licence — a document with authority behind it. 將甚執照: with what warrant? (將 = jiāng, 'with'; 甚 = shén). 折辯 is to argue an opponent down. Wukong can win the fight and still lose the case.
Here the legal scruple is argued out in full. Wukong's premise is the proverb 拿賊拿贓 — a thief must be caught with the goods — and his difficulty is that three years of successful rule have left no seam anywhere. No betraying horse's hoof, no whisper leaked, and a place at the center of every relationship in the kingdom, from the royal bed to the ranks of the court.
The comedy is in the imagined cross-examination. Though 'a mouthless gourd,' the demon would still roll a few rolls and put up a defense, and would ask, from the throne, exactly what he is accused of. Without a warrant or a body of evidence, Wukong foresees the whole seizure collapsing into an argument he cannot win.
The passage crystallizes the chapter's turn from force to proof. The demon cannot simply be overpowered and denounced; the usurpation has to be documented. That is why the drowned king's body must come out of the well — it is the one piece of evidence that converts Wukong's certainty into a case — and the plan he unfolds next follows straight from this need.