闖下甚禍 What Trouble Have We Caused
我與你有甚相干,你卻將毒藥茶藥倒我的人?」道士道:「你這個村畜生闖下禍來,你豈不知?」行者道:「我們才進你門,方敘了坐次,道及鄉貫,又不曾有個高言,那裡闖下甚禍?」我与你有甚相干,你却将毒药茶药倒我的人?」道士道:「你这个村畜生闯下祸来,你岂不知?」行者道:「我们才进你门,方叙了坐次,道及乡贯,又不曾有个高言,那里闯下甚祸?」
逐句解 Line by line
"What have I to do with you, that you should drug my people down with poisoned tea?"
甚 is shén, meaning what — not shèn, meaning very. The chapter has eight bare 甚 and six of them are this interrogative one. 相干 is to have a bearing on, to concern — still alive in 不相干, nothing to do with me. And 藥倒 uses 藥 as a verb, to drug, with 倒 as dǎo, the result: drugged them down.
"You coarse animal," said the Daoist, "you have brought this trouble down on yourself. Can you really not know it?"
He has taken Pilgrim's insult and added his own to the front of it — 村畜生, coarse animal, welding 村魯 and 畜生 into one word. 闖下禍 is to blunder into trouble, with 闖 carrying the sense of barging in where you should not.
"We had only just come in at your door," said Pilgrim. "We had barely settled who sat where and said where we were from. Not one sharp word had passed. What trouble have we blundered into?"
坐次 is the seating order — who sits where, which in a Chinese room is a real subject — and 鄉貫 is one's native place, the standard thing a stranger asks and the exact question that condemned them. 高言 is a raised or haughty word. Note 不曾 here bases correctly as céng with no help, twenty characters before 可曾 in the next passage does not.
Pilgrim's question is the honest one and he means it: what have I ever done to you? He does not know about Gossamer Cave; he was not at the bathing pool in any way that seemed to matter; and from where he stands a stranger has poisoned three men over nothing.
His defence is a small masterpiece of literal accuracy. We came in, we sat down, we said where we were from, nobody raised his voice. Every clause is true, and the third one is the whole problem — 道及鄉貫, we mentioned our native place, is precisely the moment the Daoist decided to kill them. Pilgrim lists it as evidence of innocence.
And the Daoist's 你豈不知 — can you really not know — is not rhetorical. He is genuinely surprised. He assumes these four know what they did at his sisters' cave and are brazening it out. Neither man is lying and neither understands the other, which is why the next question has to be asked outright.