豈敢相戲 I Would Not Dare Mock You
所以進退兩難,才變做一個鯪鯉鱗,從地下鑽出來。正自悲切,忽聽得你哭,故此相問。因見你為丈夫有此紙錢報答,我師父喪身,更無一物相酬,所以自怨生悲,豈敢相戲。」所以进退两难,才变做一个鲮鲤鳞,从地下钻出来。正自悲切,忽听得你哭,故此相问。因见你为丈夫有此纸钱报答,我师父丧身,更无一物相酬,所以自怨生悲,岂敢相戏。」
逐句解 Line by line
"So I could go neither forward nor back, and I turned into a scaly anteater and bored my way out through the ground."
進退兩難 — hard both to advance and to retreat — is a four-character idiom still in daily use for being stuck between bad options, and it is the exact summary of the five directions he refused one by one inside the light. 鑽 is zuān here, the verb.
"I was just there in my grief when I heard you weeping, and so I asked."
Another 聽得, another dé, and 相問 is xiāng — asked you, with the reciprocal marking the direction of the action rather than any mutuality. That is a real function of 相 in early vernacular: it can point a verb at the person you are talking to.
"And seeing that you have this paper money to repay your husband with, while my master has lost his life and I have not one thing to offer him in return — that is why I fell to blaming myself and grieving. How should I dare to mock you?"
更無一物相酬 — not one further thing to repay him with — is the heart of it, and 相酬 is xiāng again, pointed at the master. 豈敢, how should I dare, is a formal disclaimer. Three 相 in this one passage and all three are xiāng; the only xiàng in the whole speech was 本相, true form.
The answer to her accusation is the best speech Pilgrim is given in this chapter, and it turns on a comparison he makes against himself. You have paper money to burn for your husband. My master is dead and I have nothing at all to give him. That is why I was crying.
It is also, technically, an apology for a social offence — he has been accused of 欺心, faking a feeling — and he answers it by explaining the feeling. The whole four-passage speech, credentials and monsters and golden light and all, exists to get to this sentence.
And it is worth holding on to 更無一物相酬 for what comes next. He has just told a stranger on a road that his master is dead and he has nothing to offer. He is wrong about the first part and about to find out, and the person he is telling is not a widow.