三千諸佛 Three Thousand Buddhas
長老戰兢兢的爬起來再看,真個是四個字,乃「小雷音寺」。三藏道:「就是小雷音寺,必定也有個佛祖在內。經上言三千諸佛,想是不在一方:似觀音在南海,普賢在峨眉,文殊在五臺。這不知是那一位佛祖的道場。古人云:『有佛有經,無方無寶。』我們可進去來。」长老战兢兢的爬起来再看,真个是四个字,乃「小雷音寺」。三藏道:「就是小雷音寺,必定也有个佛祖在内。经上言三千诸佛,想是不在一方:似观音在南海,普贤在峨眉,文殊在五台。这不知是那一位佛祖的道场。古人云:『有佛有经,无方无宝。』我们可进去来。」
逐句解 Line by line
The elder got up trembling and looked again, and there were indeed four characters: Lesser Thunderclap Monastery.
One graph is the difference between the place he wants and the place he is standing in front of, and the text delivers it as flatly as it possibly can: 真個是四個字, there really were four. He is still trembling — and still frightened of the wrong thing.
Tripitaka said, "Even if it is the Lesser Thunderclap Monastery, there is bound to be a Buddha inside."
就是 concedes the point and sets it aside in the same breath. Shown that the name is not the one he read, he keeps his conclusion and changes his premise, which is the manoeuvre the rest of the speech elaborates.
"The scriptures speak of three thousand Buddhas, and I suppose they are not all in one quarter — as Guanyin is at the Southern Sea, Samantabhadra on Emei, and Mañjuśrī on Wutai."
Three of the four great bodhisattva mountains, and the argument is perfectly sound as far as it goes: holiness really is spread about. Guanyin is at the Southern Sea, Samantabhadra on Emei, Mañjuśrī on Wutai. The fourth mountain, Kṣitigarbha's, goes unmentioned anywhere in the chapter — and the sound doctrine is being used to license walking into a building on the strength of a signboard.
"There is no telling which Buddha's place of practice this may be."
那 is nǎ again, licensed by the 不知 in front of it. 場 reads chǎng here, the reading for an actual venue — and this is the only place in the whole chapter where the graph is neither the level-tone measure word nor a rhyme.
"The ancients said: where there is a Buddha there are scriptures; where there is no such quarter there is no treasure. Let us go in."
The saying turns his own argument round: if holiness is distributed by place, then a place with a Buddha in it will have scriptures. Between the colon and the inner quotation the edition prints a wide typographic space of a kind the reading edition cannot carry, since its words are already separated by ordinary spaces.
This is the passage where the chapter is lost. Tripitaka has just been shown that the sign says something other than what he read, and he answers with a piece of genuine doctrine — the Buddhas are many and they are not all in one place — which makes the difference between the two names beside the point.
None of the doctrine is wrong. Guanyin really is placed at the Southern Sea, Samantabhadra on Emei, Mañjuśrī on Wutai, and three thousand Buddhas is a scriptural commonplace. What is wrong is the step he takes next, from holiness is distributed to this building is one of its distributions, and nothing in the premises will carry him there.
The quotation he finishes on does the same work in miniature. It is offered as authority and it is perfectly circular: where there is a Buddha there are scriptures. Whether there is a Buddha is the only thing anybody has been asking.