一門同氣 Of One Gate And Breath
行者道:「這賊怪甚不達理。我雖不受國王的恩惠,不食他的水米,不該與他出力;但是你偷他的寶貝,污他的寶塔,屢年屈苦金光寺僧人,他是我一門同氣,我怎麼不與他出力,辨明冤枉?」行者道:「这贼怪甚不达理。我虽不受国王的恩惠,不食他的水米,不该与他出力;但是你偷他的宝贝,污他的宝塔,屡年屈苦金光寺僧人,他是我一门同气,我怎么不与他出力,辨明冤枉?」
逐句解 Line by line
Pilgrim said, "This thieving fiend is quite past reason.
甚 is shèn here, the intensifier — quite, exceedingly — modifying 不達理. This is the reading pypinyin supplies wherever the graph stands alone, and for once it is the right one; the interrogative shén that the corpus usually has to force belongs inside 甚麼 and to frames like 做甚.
Though I have taken no favour from the king, and eaten none of his water and rice, and am under no obligation to exert myself for him;
Three denials in a row, each with its own 不, and the mechanical rule does not treat them alike: bú before the falling 受 shòu, then bù before the rising 食 shí and the level 該 gāi. 水米, water and rice, is the vernacular for board and keep. The member ends at a semicolon and is deliberately left standing apart from what answers it.
yet since you stole his treasure and defiled his pagoda, and year after year kept the monks of the Temple of Golden Light in wrongful suffering — and they are of one gate and one breath with me — how should I not exert myself for them and make the wrong plain?"
一門同氣 — of one gate and one breath — is a kinship formula for brothers, borrowed here for a religious order: the monks are Buddhists, and so is he. That is the whole of his answer to the charge of having no standing. 枉 holds wǎng by the invariant ruling. 一 takes yì before the rising 門 mén.
The answer is built as a concession and a rebuttal, and the concession is unusually complete. He grants every point: no favour taken, no board eaten, no obligation owed. Having conceded the standing question entirely, he then answers it on other grounds, which is a stronger move than disputing it would have been.
The grounds are 一門同氣, a phrase for brothers of one house borrowed to cover a religious order. The monks of the Temple of Golden Light are Buddhists and so is he, and that relation is what gives him standing where the king's patronage did not. It is worth noticing that a monkey who spent the first eight couplets of his recitation on a career of celestial insubordination is here claiming membership of a monastic family.
The two members are printed with a semicolon between them and are left apart rather than joined, because they are not the strictly parallel pair the joining rule wants: the second runs to twice the length of the first and escalates from three denials into three charges and a demand.