原文 Original text
繁體 Traditional
Reader's edition
官法佛法
The Magistrate's Law and the Buddha's
菩薩道:「古人云,『若要有前程,莫做沒前程。』你既上界違法,今又不改兇心,傷生造孽,卻不是二罪俱罰?」那怪道:「前程,前程,若依你,教我喝風?常言道:『依著官法打殺,依著佛法餓殺。』去也,去也,還不如捉個行人,肥膩膩的吃他家娘,管甚麼二罪三罪,千罪萬罪!」菩薩道:「『人有善願,天必從之。』汝若肯歸依正果,自有養身之處。世有五穀,可以濟饑,為何吃人度日?」菩萨道:「古人云,『若要有前程,莫做没前程。』你既上界违法,今又不改凶心,伤生造孽,却不是二罪俱罚?」那怪道:「前程,前程,若依你,教我喝风?常言道:『依著官法打杀,依著佛法饿杀。』去也,去也,还不如捉个行人,肥腻腻的吃他家娘,管甚么二罪三罪,千罪万罪!」菩萨道:「『人有善愿,天必从之。』汝若肯归依正果,自有养身之处。世有五谷,可以济饥,为何吃人度日?」
逐句解 Line by line
菩薩道:「古人云,『若要有前程,莫做沒前程。』
菩萨道:「古人云,『若要有前程,莫做没前程。』
The Bodhisattva said: “The ancients say, ‘If you would have a future, do nothing that forfeits a future.’
A proverb on consequence: present deeds determine future prospects (前程).
你既上界違法,今又不改兇心,傷生造孽,卻不是二罪俱罰?」
你既上界违法,今又不改凶心,伤生造孽,却不是二罪俱罚?」
You broke the law in the upper realm, and now, unrepentant of your savage heart, you harm life and pile up sin — is this not crime to be doubly punished?”
不改 — 不 takes bù before third-tone 改; 不是 takes bú before 是.
那怪道:「前程,前程,若依你,教我喝風?
那怪道:「前程,前程,若依你,教我喝风?
The monster said: “A future, a future! If I did as you say, would you have me feed on wind?
喝風 — “to drink wind,” i.e. to starve.
常言道:『依著官法打殺,依著佛法餓殺。』
常言道:『依著官法打杀,依著佛法饿杀。』
As the common saying goes: ‘Follow the magistrate's law and be beaten to death; follow the Buddha's law and be starved to death.’
依著 — “following, according to”; the durative 著 is read zhe. The jingle sets worldly and monastic law as equally fatal.
去也,去也,還不如捉個行人,肥膩膩的吃他家娘,管甚麼二罪三罪,千罪萬罪!」
去也,去也,还不如捉个行人,肥腻腻的吃他家娘,管甚么二罪三罪,千罪万罪!」
Away, away! Better to catch a traveler and eat him, fat and greasy, than to mind your ‘double crime, triple crime, a thousand crimes, ten thousand crimes’!”
還不如 — 還 is the adverb hái; 不如 takes bù before second-tone 如.
菩薩道:「『人有善願,天必從之。』
菩萨道:「『人有善愿,天必从之。』
The Bodhisattva said: “‘If a man has a good wish, Heaven will surely grant it.’
A maxim countering the demon's fatalism: good intention draws Heaven's favor.
汝若肯歸依正果,自有養身之處。
汝若肯归依正果,自有养身之处。
If you will take refuge in the right fruit, you shall have the means to nourish yourself.
世有五穀,可以濟饑,為何吃人度日?」
世有五谷,可以济饥,为何吃人度日?」
The world has the five grains to relieve hunger; why live by eating men?”
五穀 — the five staple grains. 為何 — “why”; 為 is read wèi.
總評 Commentary
This brief exchange is the chapter's sharpest piece of dialogue, a genuine debate rather than a mere submission. The boar resists conversion not from defiance but from a kind of peasant despair, captured in the bitter jingle: 依著官法打殺,依著佛法餓殺 — obey the magistrate and be beaten dead, obey the Buddha and be starved dead. Either law, to him, is a death sentence.
Guanyin answers fatalism with providence. To the proverb that crime invites doubled punishment she opposes another — 人有善願,天必從之, “if a man has a good wish, Heaven will grant it” — and resolves the boar's false dilemma with a practical mercy: the five grains can feed him, so he need not eat men. The theological abstraction is brought down to the level of a hungry creature's next meal.
Following Anthony C. Yu, the passage stages in miniature the novel's central argument about the possibility of reform. Plaks reads Bajie's resistance as the most humanly persuasive of the disciples' — the voice of ordinary appetite and ordinary despair — which makes Guanyin's patient answer, and his eventual yielding, the more meaningful.