扯破分之 Tear It Up and Divide It
禁子們跪道:「老爹,才子提審,送下四個和尚,乃是大夥強盜。他見我們打了他幾下,把這兩個包袱與我。我們打開看時,見有此物,無可處置:若眾人扯破分之,其實可惜;若獨歸一人,眾人無利。幸老爹來,憑老爹做個劈著。」獄官見了,乃是一件袈裟;又將別項衣服,並引袋兒通檢看了。禁子们跪道:「老爹,才子提审,送下四个和尚,乃是大伙强盗。他见我们打了他几下,把这两个包袱与我。我们打开看时,见有此物,无可处置:若众人扯破分之,其实可惜;若独归一人,众人无利。幸老爹来,凭老爹做个劈着。」狱官见了,乃是一件袈裟;又将别项衣服,并引袋儿通检看了。
逐句解 Line by line
The turnkeys knelt and said, "Sir, a hearing was held just now and four monks were sent down, a whole gang of robbers. They saw us give them a few blows and handed us these two bundles."
才子 — just now. It looks like the word for a talented man and is not: here the two characters together are an adverb of time, and the second has gone weightless. 提審 — held a hearing, brought up for examination. The gaolers describe the trial in its technical term. ⚠ Their account is honest as far as it goes. They admit the beating without embarrassment — it is not something they need to hide — and they report that the bundles were handed over rather than seized.
"When we opened them up to look, we found this thing, and there was no way of dealing with it. If we all tear it up and divide it, that is a real shame; and if it goes to one man alone, the rest of us get nothing."
⚠ 無可處置 — no way of dealing with it. The first character of those middle two is the verb, to handle or dispose of, not the noun meaning a place — which is what the same character means at six other points in this chapter. 扯破分之 — tear it up and divide it. They are seriously considering cutting a sacred robe into shares, and the only thing stopping them is that it would be a waste. The problem they have is a real one and they state it clearly: an indivisible asset and a group of claimants. It is a fair description of why loot causes trouble.
"Luckily your honour has come. Let your honour make the split." The warden looked, and it was a cassock;
⚠ 劈著 — the split, the ruling. The last character here is a noun: a move, a stroke, a way of settling a thing, the same word behind a clever move at chess. It is the rarest of this character's four jobs and this is the only place in the chapter it turns up. The gaolers are asking their superior to arbitrate a division of stolen goods, openly, as though it were routine. It evidently is.
and he went through the other clothes and the satchel as well, checking everything.
通檢看了 — went through and checked the lot. The warden is not appraising; he is doing an inventory, which is his job. ⚠ This is the sentence the chapter turns on, and it is a piece of routine administration. He looks at everything because an officer taking custody of property looks at everything. Nobody asked him to.
The gaolers' problem is a genuine one and they put it plainly: a valuable thing that cannot be divided and a room full of men with equal claims. Tear it and it is worth nothing; give it to one and the rest are cheated. So they ask an officer to arbitrate, and he agrees to, and none of it strikes anybody as irregular.
That casualness is the point. This is not a corrupt prison in a story about a corrupt prison. It is an ordinary one, where new arrivals are beaten until they pay and confiscated goods are shared among the staff, and everybody from the turnkeys to the warden treats both as normal procedure.
And it saves them. The warden checks the satchel because taking custody of property means listing it, not because anyone suspects a miscarriage of justice. An inventory is about to rescue them.