死去五六年 My Uncle Has Been Dead Six Years
獄中土地、城隍不安,報了閻王,閻王差鬼使押解我來教你赴府再告,釋放唐僧,庶免災咎;不然,老幼皆亡。』因此,特來遞個解詞。望老爺方便方便。」刺史聽他說了這話,卻暗想道:「他那父親乃是熱屍,新鬼顯魂,報應猶可;我伯父死去五六年了,卻怎麼今夜也來顯魂,教我審放?看起來必是冤枉。」狱中土地、城隍不安,报了阎王,阎王差鬼使押解我来教你赴府再告,释放唐僧,庶免灾咎;不然,老幼皆亡。』因此,特来递个解词。望老爷方便方便。」刺史听他说了这话,却暗想道:「他那父亲乃是热尸,新鬼显魂,报应犹可;我伯父死去五六年了,却怎么今夜也来显魂,教我审放?看起来必是冤枉。」
逐句解 Line by line
"'The earth god and the city god of the gaol are unquiet, and have reported it to King Yama, who has dispatched a ghost-runner to escort me here and tell you to go to the prefecture and appeal again, and get the Tang monk released, so that calamity may be avoided; and if not, old and young alike shall perish.' And so we have come specially to hand in a retraction. We beg your honour's indulgence."
差 — dispatched. The fifth of this chapter's seven, and the invented chain of command is now being recited back by the people Monkey invented it for. 押解 — escorted under guard. This one comes out right without help, where the same character wanted the same reading and did not at han#2921 when the soldiers marched the pilgrims into the hall. The chain can reach it through one word and not the other. 庶免災咎 — so that calamity may be avoided. Formal, almost liturgical language for what is, underneath, a threat.
The prefect heard him out and thought privately, "Their father is a warm corpse; a newly dead man showing himself, that much one might credit. But my uncle has been dead five or six years — how is it that he too came last night to tell me to hear the case and release them? Looking at it, there must be a wrong here."
報應猶可 — that much one might credit. The middle two characters mean the response a deed draws, and the second takes the answering reading, not the one meaning ought. The word turns up twice in the novel and the reading comes out wrong at both. 熱屍 — a warm corpse. The prefect is applying a rule of evidence to ghosts, and the rule is that a fresh death is more likely to walk than an old one. He is reasoning about the supernatural exactly as carefully as he reasoned about the robbery. 看起來必是冤枉 — looking at it, there must be a wrong here. This is the moment the case turns, and what turns it is not evidence but corroboration: two independent ghosts, on one night, saying the same thing. And he is right. There is a wrong here, and both ghosts were the same monkey.
The prefect's reasoning is careful, methodical, and reaches the correct conclusion from entirely false premises. A newly dead man might well appear; an uncle six years gone is another matter; two apparitions in one night about the same case cannot be coincidence. Therefore there has been a miscarriage of justice.
Every step of that is sound and every step is wrong. There were no ghosts. There was one monkey doing two voices in two houses inside a single hour before dawn, and the very thing the prefect finds most convincing — that the second visitation was so improbable — is the part that was easiest to fake.
It is also the exact mirror of how he convicted them. Yesterday he reasoned carefully from a sworn complaint and stolen goods and got the wrong answer. Today he reasons carefully from two ghosts and gets the right one. The quality of his thinking has not varied at all; only the quality of what he was given to think about.