固守家業 Patching Up The Broken Doors
那老妖到中堂裡叫:「小的們,怎麼沒了燈光?只莫走了人也?」叫一聲,沒人答應;又叫一聲,又沒人答應。及取燈火來看時,只見地下血淋淋的三塊肉餅,老王父子及唐僧、八戒俱在,只不見了行者、沙僧。點著火,前後趕看,只見沙僧還背貼在廊下站哩。被他一把拿住捽倒,照舊綑了。又找尋行者,但見幾層門盡皆破損,情知是行者打破走了。也不去追趕,將破門補的補,遮的遮,固守家業不題。那老妖到中堂里叫:「小的们,怎么没了灯光?只莫走了人也?」叫一声,没人答应;又叫一声,又没人答应。及取灯火来看时,只见地下血淋淋的三块肉饼,老王父子及唐僧、八戒俱在,只不见了行者、沙僧。点着火,前后赶看,只见沙僧还背贴在廊下站哩。被他一把拿住捽倒,照旧捆了。又找寻行者,但见几层门尽皆破损,情知是行者打破走了。也不去追赶,将破门补的补,遮的遮,固守家业不题。
逐句解 Line by line
That old fiend came into the middle hall calling: "Little ones, how is it there is no lamplight?
He wakes into the aftermath and his first question is about the lighting. The novel gives him the ordinary reaction of a householder finding the lamps out, which is much more unsettling than an alarm would be.
"Surely nobody has got away?"
只莫 is the vernacular way of putting a fear as a hope - surely not, it cannot be that. He has arrived at the right answer immediately and is hoping to be told otherwise.
He called once, and nobody answered;
應 is yìng here, the reading for responding to something, and not the yīng of ought to that shares the character. 答應 is still the everyday Chinese for answering when somebody calls you.
he called again, and again nobody answered.
The novel repeats the sentence almost exactly rather than summarising it, which makes the silence take twice as long to read. This is a device that works the same way in any language.
When at last they fetched a light to look, all they saw were three blood-soaked meat pancakes on the ground; the old king and his sons and the Tang Monk and Eight Rules were all there, and only Pilgrim and Sha Monk were missing.
The discovery is delivered as a checklist - what is on the floor, who is still present, who is not. 血 takes its colloquial reading xiě inside 血淋淋, the doubled word for dripping with blood, rather than the formal xuè it has in compounds. And the meat pancakes are exactly what Pilgrim called them.
Lighting a fire and hunting front and back, they found Sha Monk still standing with his back pressed against the corridor wall.
著 is zháo here inside 點著, the reading for something that catches and takes - the fire is not merely lit but successfully alight. The difference matters in Chinese the way it does between striking a match and getting one lit. And 站哩 puts a small vernacular particle on the end that makes it almost comic: there he still was, just standing.
He seized him with one hand, threw him down, and tied him up as before.
倒 is dǎo here, the reading for toppling something over, and not the dào of on the contrary that the same character carries elsewhere in this chapter. 照舊 - just as before - is the flattest possible way to describe undoing an entire rescue.
They searched for Pilgrim too, but saw only that several sets of doors had all been smashed through, and knew in their bones that Pilgrim had broken out and gone.
情知 again - the knowing that arrives whole, without reasoning. It was used of Pilgrim when he walked into the ambush, and is used of the fiend here, which quietly puts the two of them on a level.
He did not go after him, but had the broken doors patched where they could be patched and screened where they could be screened, and held his household secure - of which we say no more.
The line that finishes the passage and defines the creature. 補的補,遮的遮 is a vernacular pattern that means doing what can be done to each - patch the ones that patch, cover the ones that cover. And 家業 is a household and its property, an estate. He has just lost three servants and been burgled, and his response is repairs.
The chapter turns the camera round. Everything since the beating has been watched from Pilgrim's side; here we sit with the fiend as he walks into a dark hall and works out, question by question, what has happened to him.
What he does about it is the striking part. He does not roar, pursue or retaliate. He counts the bodies, recaptures the one prisoner still standing, notes which doors are broken, and sets about the repairs. A little earlier he was setting a rota for beatings; here he is doing maintenance.
That steadiness has been consistent from his first line in the chapter, which was an instruction about hostages. This is a villain whose menace is entirely administrative, and the novel has now shown it under three separate kinds of pressure without once letting him lose his temper.