行者細述 Pilgrim Tells What He Saw
沙僧道:「二哥且休取笑。如今天色晚矣,大哥傷了頭,師父又不知死活,怎的是好?」行者哼道:「師父沒事。我進去時,變作蜜蜂兒,飛入裡面,見那婦人坐在花亭子上。少頃,兩個丫鬟捧兩盤饝饝:一盤是人肉餡,葷的;一盤是鄧沙餡,素的。又著兩個女童扶師父出來吃一個壓驚,又要與師父做甚麼道伴兒。師父始初不與那婦人答話,也不吃饝饝。後見他甜言美語,不知怎麼,就開口說話,卻說吃素的。沙僧道:「二哥且休取笑。如今天色晚矣,大哥伤了头,师父又不知死活,怎的是好?」行者哼道:「师父没事。我进去时,变作蜜蜂儿,飞入里面,见那妇人坐在花亭子上。少顷,两个丫鬟捧两盘饝饝:一盘是人肉馅,荤的;一盘是邓沙馅,素的。又着两个女童扶师父出来吃一个压惊,又要与师父做甚么道伴儿。师父始初不与那妇人答话,也不吃饝饝。后见他甜言美语,不知怎么,就开口说话,却说吃素的。
逐句解 Line by line
Sha Monk said, “Second brother, leave off your joking. The light is going now, eldest brother has hurt his head, and we do not so much as know whether our master is alive or dead. What are we to do?”
怎的 takes 的 as the toneless de. Sha Monk is doing what he does throughout this chapter: cutting the horseplay short and asking the practical question.
Pilgrim said with a groan, “Our master is well enough. When I went in I changed into a bee and flew inside, and saw that woman seated up in the flower pavilion.
沒事 takes 沒 as méi. 蜜蜂兒 takes the curled-tongue ending er and 亭子 the light zi, both as in the scene he is retelling.
“Presently two maidservants brought in two platters of buns: one platter with a filling of human flesh, which was the meat; one with a filling of sweet bean paste, which was the fast fare.
少頃 takes 少 as shǎo, "a little while", not the shào of youth. The two halves either side of the semicolon are a matched pair and stay in one line.
“Then she had two of the girls bring our master out to eat one and settle his fright, and after that she would have him be some sort of companion in the Way to her.
又著兩個女童 uses 著 in its sending sense, zhuó — she had the girls do it. And listen to 甚麼道伴兒: the demon said "companion in the Way" straight, and Pilgrim reports it as "some sort of companion in the Way". Two extra characters carry his entire opinion.
“At the first our master would not answer that woman at all, nor would he eat the buns.
始初 is the vernacular for "at first". Both 不 stand before third and first tones and take bù automatically.
“Then, hearing her honeyed words and her pretty speeches — I cannot tell how it came about — he opened his mouth and spoke, and said that he would eat the fast ones.
不知怎麼 is an admission of ignorance rather than a rhetorical flourish. It is Pilgrim who cannot account for what he watched — and the reader, who saw more than he did, can.
The novel now has Pilgrim retell, in about a hundred and fifty characters, an episode we have just watched at more than three times the length. The book does this constantly, and it is never merely economical: what matters is always the gap between the two tellings. Here the gap is tone. The demon offered to be a 道伴, a companion in the Way, and meant it as an inducement; Pilgrim reports that she wanted his master for 甚麼道伴兒, some sort of companion or other, and those two extra characters carry the whole of his opinion.
The compression is revealing about what Pilgrim thinks matters. He gives the two platters their full description, filling by filling, because the food is the part he understood; he gives the proposal one dismissive clause. A demon who wants to eat a monk is a familiar problem. One who wants to marry him is not, and Pilgrim's summary quietly files the second under the first.
The passage ends on an admission the reader is in a position to correct. 不知怎麼: Pilgrim cannot tell how it came about that his master, having refused to speak at all, suddenly opened his mouth. But we watched him decide. The private calculation in which Tripitaka weighed a demon against a queen and concluded that refusal might be fatal was invisible from the latticework, and the novel is making a quiet point about the limits of even Pilgrim's sight: he can turn himself into an insect and hear every word spoken in the room, and he still cannot see the one thing that explains it.