炭黑戲言 通名報姓 A Jest About Soot; Names Exchanged
行者暗笑道:「這廝真個如燒窰的一般,築煤的無二,想必是在此處刷炭為生,怎麼這等一身烏黑?」那怪厲聲高叫道:「你是個甚麼和尚,敢在我這裡大膽?」行者執鐵棒,撞至面前,大咤一聲道:「不要閑講,快還你老外公的袈裟來。」那怪道:「你是那寺裡和尚?你的袈裟在那裡失落了,敢來我這裡索取?」行者道:「我的袈裟在直北觀音院後方丈裡放著,只因那院裡失了火,你這廝趁鬨擄掠,盜了來,要做佛衣會慶壽,怎敢抵賴?快快還我,饒你性命;若牙迸半個『不』字,我推倒了黑風山,屣平了黑風洞,把你這一洞妖邪都碾為齏粉。」那怪聞言,呵呵冷笑道:「你這個潑物,原來昨夜那火就是你放的。你在那方丈屋上行兇招風,是我把一件袈裟拿來了,你待怎麼?你是那裡來的?姓甚名誰?有多大手段,敢那等海口浪言。」行者道:「是你也認不得你老外公哩。你老外公乃大唐上國駕前御弟三藏法師之徒弟,姓孫,名悟空行者。若問老孫的手段,說出來,教你魂飛魄散,死在眼前。」那怪道:「我不曾會,你有甚麼手段,說來我聽。」行者笑道:「我兒子,你站穩著,仔細聽之。我:行者暗笑道:「这厮真个如烧窰的一般,筑煤的无二,想必是在此处刷炭为生,怎么这等一身乌黑?」那怪厉声高叫道:「你是个甚么和尚,敢在我这里大胆?」行者执铁棒,撞至面前,大咤一声道:「不要闲讲,快还你老外公的袈裟来。」那怪道:「你是那寺里和尚?你的袈裟在那里失落了,敢来我这里索取?」行者道:「我的袈裟在直北观音院后方丈里放着,只因那院里失了火,你这厮趁哄掳掠,盗了来,要做佛衣会庆寿,怎敢抵赖?快快还我,饶你性命;若牙迸半个『不』字,我推倒了黑风山,屣平了黑风洞,把你这一洞妖邪都碾为齑粉。」那怪闻言,呵呵冷笑道:「你这个泼物,原来昨夜那火就是你放的。你在那方丈屋上行凶招风,是我把一件袈裟拿来了,你待怎么?你是那里来的?姓甚名谁?有多大手段,敢那等海口浪言。」行者道:「是你也认不得你老外公哩。你老外公乃大唐上国驾前御弟三藏法师之徒弟,姓孙,名悟空行者。若问老孙的手段,说出来,教你魂飞魄散,死在眼前。」那怪道:「我不曾会,你有甚么手段,说来我听。」行者笑道:「我儿子,你站稳着,仔细听之。我:
逐句解 Line by line
The Pilgrim laughed to himself and said, "This creature is the very image of a kiln-stoker, no different from a digger of coal.
He opens the encounter with a joke about trade. 燒窰 is firing a kiln and 築煤 is working coal: the black armour reads to him as soot, and its wearer as a labourer. 一般 and 無二, just like and no different, are the two halves of one comparison.
He must scrape charcoal hereabouts for a living. How else should he be black from head to heel?"
為生 takes 為 as the plain copula, wéi — to be one's livelihood — rather than the fourth-tone wèi of purpose. 刷炭 is to brush or scrape charcoal.
The fiend shouted in a harsh voice, "What manner of monk are you, that you make so bold on my ground?"
厲聲 is a voice sharpened to an edge. 甚麼 reads shén.
The Pilgrim gripped his iron rod, rushed up before him, and roared out, "No idle talk! Give back your old grandsire's cassock, and be quick about it."
大咤 — 咤, zhà, is a shout of rage. 老外公, your old grandfather on your mother's side, is one of the Pilgrim's favourite mock-kinship insults: he claims the seniority of a relative he is not. 還 is the verb huán, give it back.
The fiend said, "Which temple's monk are you? And where did you lose this cassock of yours, that you dare come here to claim it?"
Three instances of 那 in one line and two different readings, which have to be sorted out by position. 那寺裡, which temple, and 那裡失落, where did you lose it, are both asking: nǎ. But the 那怪 that opens the line is pointing: nà.
The Pilgrim said, "My cassock lay in the rear abbot's lodge of the Guanyin Temple, due north of here. Because a fire broke out in that temple,
放著 takes zhe: a state kept up, the robe lying where it was left. 直北, straight north, fixes the chapter's geography.
you took advantage of the uproar to plunder, stole it away, and would hold a Buddha-Robe Feast in honour of your birthday. How dare you deny it?
趁鬨 writes 趁哄, to take advantage of a commotion. What the Pilgrim leaves out of his indictment is that the commotion was his own doing.
Give it back at once and I will spare your life. But if so much as half the graph 'no' should crack between your teeth,
The character 不 is being quoted here as a character, inside single corner brackets — if half a 'no' cracks between your teeth. Its tone is still computed mechanically from the fourth-tone 字 that follows, giving bú. 牙迸 is to have a word crack out from between the teeth.
I will push Black Wind Mountain over, trample Black Wind Cave flat, and grind every fiend of this cave of yours to powder."
屣, xǐ, is a sandal, and as a verb to tread flat. 齏粉 is the powder that minced pickle is reduced to — the standard image for pulverising something completely. 碾為 takes the copular wéi.
Hearing this, the fiend laughed a cold laugh. "You insolent thing! So it was you who set that fire last night.
潑物 is a rascally thing. This cold laugh is the fiend's first line in the chapter, and it turns the accusation round on the accuser: the arsonist is charging him with looting a fire.
You worked your violence on the roof of that abbot's lodge and called up the wind, and I carried off a single cassock. What of it?
行兇 reads xíng — this is the one place in the chapter where the tempting misreading is háng, and it has to be set aside. 招風, calling up the wind, is exactly what the Pilgrim did in the last chapter, and the fiend knows it.
Where have you come from? What is your surname and what your name? What powers have you, that you dare talk so wide-mouthed and wild?"
Two 那 again, two readings. 那裡來的, where from, is asking: nǎ. 那等, of that sort, so very, is pointing: nà. 姓甚名誰 takes shén. 海口浪言 — a mouth as wide as the sea and words that come in waves.
The Pilgrim said, "So you cannot even know your old grandsire.
認不得 is a negative potential — the form that reports whether somebody can or cannot manage a thing — so here, cannot place you. Its 得 takes the full verb reading dé; contrast plain 認得, to know somebody by sight, where the same character is the light linking de. 哩 is the final particle, li.
Your old grandsire is disciple to Sanzang, Master of the Law, the imperial brother who stands before the throne of the Great Tang. My surname is Sun, my name Wukong, and I am called the Pilgrim.
He gives his full style, and it turns out to be a genealogy: emperor, imperial brother, master, disciple. The creature who has just been calling himself everyone's grandfather places himself fourth in a chain of four.
If you would ask after old Sun's arts, the mere telling of them would scatter your souls and lay you dead where you stand."
魂飛魄散 — the 魂 flies off and the 魄 scatters. Chinese anthropology gives a person two classes of soul, and this idiom has them parting company; it is still the ordinary way of saying somebody was scared out of their wits. 散 reads sàn.
The fiend said, "I have never met with you. What arts have you? Say them out, and I will hear."
我不曾會 means I have never run into you. The fiend asks to be told — and by asking, licenses the four hundred and fifty characters that are about to arrive.
The Pilgrim laughed. "My son, stand steady and listen with care. As for me:
站穩著 ends with 著 in its modal use, zhe, neither the continuous nor the resultative reading — stand steady, will you. And 我兒子, my boy, answers 老外公 from a moment ago: the Pilgrim has now claimed two generations of seniority inside two minutes.
Neither of them can see the other. The Pilgrim looks at black armour and sees a coalman; the fiend looks at a monk and cannot place him at all. The comedy here is the comedy of mistaken identity, and it runs in both directions equally — which is why the scene turns almost at once into an exchange of names. 你是那寺裡和尚? and 姓甚名誰? are the questions of a creature who would like to know what it is fighting.
What the fiend says in his own defence is unanswerable, and the narrative simply lets it stand. He did not burn the temple. He took one garment out of a house that was already alight. 你在那方丈屋上行兇招風,是我把一件袈裟拿來了,你待怎麼? — you were the one working violence on that roof and whistling up the wind; I picked up a cassock; what of it? The Pilgrim does not answer the charge. He recites his lineage instead, and then, invited to describe his powers, launches into his autobiography — a change of subject so magnificent that the reader forgets a question was ever asked.