故變模樣 It Was Me All Along
那媽媽道:「剛才一個食癆病黃胖和尚,他化齋去了,也說是東土往西天去的,怎麼又有一起?」八戒忍不住笑道:「就是我。因我生得嘴長耳大,恐你家害怕,不肯與齋,故變作那等模樣。你不信,我兄弟衣兜裡不是你家鍋巴飯?」那妈妈道:「刚才一个食痨病黄胖和尚,他化斋去了,也说是东土往西天去的,怎么又有一起?」八戒忍不住笑道:「就是我。因我生得嘴长耳大,恐你家害怕,不肯与斋,故变作那等模样。你不信,我兄弟衣兜里不是你家锅巴饭?」
逐句解 Line by line
The old dame said: “Only just now there was a sallow, bloated monk with a wasting sickness — he has had his alms and gone, and he too said he came from the Land of the East on his way west. How is it there is another party of you?”
She repeats her objection almost word for word, and the repetition is what finally forces the confession. 一起 -- one party, one lot of them -- lifts 一 to yì before the dipping tone of 起, by the ordinary rule.
Bajie could not keep in his laughter: “That was me. Because I was born with a long snout and big ears, I was afraid your household would take fright and give me nothing, so I changed myself into that shape.
Bajie owns up cheerfully. 嘴長 takes 長 at cháng, long -- the third of the chapter's four such readings, against sixteen where the same character means "elder". 生得 takes 得 as the link hanging a description off the verb, de. 模樣 takes 模 at its fixed mú, against the mó an automatic reading supplies.
“If you do not believe me — is that not your own crusted rice in my brother's robe?”
兄弟 keeps both syllables at full weight. The proof offered is the rice itself, still sitting in Sha Monk's robe where it was put two passages ago -- physical evidence, produced on the spot.
The confession is delivered cheerfully and settles nothing about the chapter's real problem, which is why it is funny. Bajie explains that he changed his face because his own would have frightened her out of giving anything -- a piece of plain self-knowledge -- and produces the crusted rice as evidence.
The scene is also a small structural joke at the chapter's expense. An impostor wearing a false shape has just walked up to these people, said the right things and been believed. Here the same trick, performed by a friend for a bowl of rice, is confessed within the hour and proved by producing the goods. The difference between the two impostures is that one of them is going to be found out.