半途而廢 Halfway and Abandoned
二人歡歡喜喜回至路上,只見三藏面磕地,倒在塵埃;白馬撒韁,在路傍長嘶跑跳;行李擔不見蹤影。慌得八戒跌腳搥胸,大呼小叫道:「不消講,不消講,這還是孫行者趕走的餘黨,來此打殺師父,搶了行李去了。」沙僧道:「且去把馬拴住!」只叫:「怎麼好?怎麼好?這誠所謂半途而廢,中道而止也。」叫一聲:「師父。」滿眼拋珠,傷心痛哭。八戒道:「兄弟,且休哭。如今事已到此,取經之事,且莫說了。你看著師父的屍靈,等我把馬騎到那個府州縣鄉村店集賣幾兩銀子,買口棺木,把師父埋了,我兩個各尋道路散夥。」二人欢欢喜喜回至路上,只见三藏面磕地,倒在尘埃;白马撒缰,在路傍长嘶跑跳;行李担不见踪影。慌得八戒跌脚搥胸,大呼小叫道:「不消讲,不消讲,这还是孙行者赶走的余党,来此打杀师父,抢了行李去了。」沙僧道:「且去把马拴住!」只叫:「怎么好?怎么好?这诚所谓半途而废,中道而止也。」叫一声:「师父。」满眼抛珠,伤心痛哭。八戒道:「兄弟,且休哭。如今事已到此,取经之事,且莫说了。你看着师父的尸灵,等我把马骑到那个府州县乡村店集卖几两银子,买口棺木,把师父埋了,我两个各寻道路散伙。」
逐句解 Line by line
The two of them came back to the road in high spirits — and there was Tripitaka face down on the ground, fallen in the dust; the white horse loose from its halter, neighing long and plunging about by the roadside; and the baggage-load nowhere to be seen.
One sweep of the eye takes in the wreck. Three things hang off a single 只見 -- master, horse, baggage -- and the sentence does not stop between them. 長嘶 takes 長 at cháng, a long-drawn neigh; this is the second of the chapter's four such readings, against sixteen where the same character means "elder" and reads zhǎng. 行李擔 takes 擔 at dàn, the load as a thing. 倒在塵埃 is the toppling dǎo. One trap here: 行李 reads xíng, as it does everywhere, but inside the longer run 跑跳行李擔 an automatic reading breaks the phrase up and produces háng instead. It is the only place in the chapter where that happens to any of the fifty-four appearances of 行, and it is very easy to miss.
Bajie was thrown into a panic, stamping his feet and beating his breast, and bawled out: “No need to say it, no need to say it! This will be the remnant of that gang Sun Pilgrim drove off. They have come here and beaten the master to death and carried off the baggage.”
Bajie's diagnosis is wrong and completely reasonable. 慌得 takes 得 as the link hanging a consequence off the verb, de. 餘黨 -- the surviving remnant of a gang -- points straight back at the bandits of the previous chapter, who had every motive and are exactly the sort of people who take baggage.
Sha Monk said: “Go and make the horse fast first!”
The practical instinct, in the middle of a catastrophe: before you grieve, secure the animal.
And he could only cry: “What are we to do? What are we to do?
He can manage three characters, and then says them twice.
“This is what is meant by giving up halfway and stopping in mid-course.”
半途而廢 and 中道而止 are two classical four-character formulas for abandoning something unfinished, set side by side. The first is still in daily use in Chinese for anyone who gives up half way. 中道 takes 中 at zhōng. Sha Monk reaches for literary language at the worst moment of the chapter, which is very much like him.
He called out once: “Master.”
Five characters, and one of them is the whole segment. He calls out once: master.
His eyes streamed and he wept with a breaking heart.
滿眼拋珠 -- casting pearls from brimming eyes -- is a set figure for weeping, and the novel uses it here entirely straight.
Bajie said: “Brother, leave off weeping. Things have come to this, and we had best say no more about fetching scriptures.
And Bajie starts winding up the pilgrimage. 兄弟 keeps both syllables at full weight, as it does throughout this corpus.
“You keep watch over the master's remains, and let me ride the horse to whatever prefecture or department or county, village or market town there may be, and sell it for a few taels of silver, and buy a coffin, and bury the master; and then the two of us will each go our own way and break up the company.”
The plan is a horse, a coffin, and goodbye. 那個府州縣鄉村店集 is the whichever-there-may-be 那, nǎ -- the reading this corpus has settled for that construction, not the pointing nà. 散夥 takes 散 as the verb "to break up", sàn. 兩 in 幾兩銀子 is the weight, and it is rendered "taels" because English borrowed a name for this particular Chinese unit; where English has no such name -- 寸 earlier in the chapter -- the Chinese word is kept instead.
The discovery is staged as one sweep of the eye. A single 只見 governs three clauses -- the master face down, the horse loose and screaming, the baggage gone -- and the sentence never stops between them. The novel could have given each its own sentence and chose not to; the effect is of taking the whole scene in at once, which is how it would actually happen.
Bajie's diagnosis is wrong and entirely reasonable. Bandits were beaten to death in the previous chapter, a surviving gang would have motive, and the baggage is gone -- which is what robbers take. He cannot reach the true explanation, because reaching it would require knowing that Wukong is at Potalaka, and the only party to this scene who knows that is the reader.
What the two of them settle on is the real shock. Not revenge, not pursuit -- a horse to sell, a coffin to buy, and then 散夥, break up the company. The pilgrimage is treated as finished, and the phrase Sha Monk reaches for, 半途而廢, is the classical formula for exactly that. Fifty-six chapters of journey are wound up by its two least decisive members in the space of two speeches.