酆都城鬼王 The Ghost King of Fengdu
老孫審得此情,吩咐功曹等眾暗中保護師父,我尋近門前叫罵。那三怪齊出,都像牛頭鬼形。第一個使鉞斧,第二個使大刀,第三個使藤棍。後引一窩子牛頭鬼怪,搖旗擂鼓,與老孫鬥了一日,殺個手平。那妖王搖動旗,小妖都來。我見天晚,恐不能取勝,所以駕觔斗回來也。」八戒道:「那裡想是酆都城鬼王弄喧?」沙僧道:「你怎麼就猜道是酆都城鬼王弄喧?」八戒笑道:「哥哥說是牛頭鬼怪,故知之耳。」老孙审得此情,吩咐功曹等众暗中保护师父,我寻近门前叫骂。那三怪齐出,都像牛头鬼形。第一个使钺斧,第二个使大刀,第三个使藤棍。后引一窝子牛头鬼怪,摇旗擂鼓,与老孙斗了一日,杀个手平。那妖王摇动旗,小妖都来。我见天晚,恐不能取胜,所以驾觔斗回来也。」八戒道:「那里想是酆都城鬼王弄喧?」沙僧道:「你怎么就猜道是酆都城鬼王弄喧?」八戒笑道:「哥哥说是牛头鬼怪,故知之耳。」
逐句解 Line by line
"Old Monkey got the truth of it out of them, told the Sentinels and the rest to guard our master unseen, and went and found the gate and shouted abuse.
審得此情 uses 審, the word for a judicial examination — the same word the demons used when they decided to question Tripitaka. Both sides in this chapter conduct hearings. And Pilgrim's method, 叫罵, was to stand at the door and shout insults, which is a recognised opening move in this novel.
"Those three fiends all came out, and every one had the shape of an ox-headed ghost.
The identification Pilgrim gives his brothers is wrong, and he corrects it himself two passages later. He is describing what they looked like, not what they were, in a chapter about the difference.
"The first used a battle-axe, the second a great sabre, the third a vine-staff.
The armoury recited a second time — the reader saw it in the portrait poem, and hears it again as testimony. The vine-staff still stands out as the odd one, and it is the one that ended the fight.
"Behind them they brought a whole nestful of ox-headed ghost-monsters, waving flags and beating drums, and they fought with old Monkey a whole day and came out even.
殺個手平 — fought to a level hand — is a wrestler's phrase for a draw. Pilgrim reports the result honestly, which he does not always.
"That demon king shook his banner and all the little demons came on.
The flag again. The chapter has now told this detail three times: the signalling is what beat him, not the fighting.
"Seeing it was late and fearing I could not win, I therefore rode my somersault cloud back here."
The admission, given plainly and without excuse. A reading: 斗 in 觔斗 is dǒu, the somersault, as chapter 4 seals it.
Eight Rules said, "Over there — I suppose that will be the ghost king of the city of Fengdu, playing tricks?"
酆都城 is Fengdu, the city of the dead in Chinese popular religion — a real town on the Yangtze that folklore turned into the entrance to the underworld, and which still runs a ghost-themed tourist trade on the strength of it. Its officers are the ox-headed and horse-faced constables who fetch the dead, which is why Pig has jumped to them.
Sha the Monk said, "How do you come to guess it is the ghost king of Fengdu playing tricks?"
Sha Monk asking the reasonable question, which is his function in almost every conversation he is in.
Eight Rules said with a laugh, "Elder brother said they were ox-headed ghost-monsters, and so I knew it."
And Pig's reasoning is laid bare and it is impeccable — from a false premise. Ox-headed ghosts work for Fengdu; these are ox-headed ghosts; therefore Fengdu. The logic is sound and the conclusion is wrong, because the description he built it on was only a description. That is the chapter's whole subject, played once more as a joke among friends.
Pilgrim's report ends with an honest account of a draw and a retreat, and then the passage turns into a small comedy of deduction. Pig hears "ox-headed ghost-monsters" and concludes at once that this must be the ghost king of Fengdu — the city of the dead, whose bailiffs are precisely the ox-headed and horse-faced constables of Chinese popular religion.
His reasoning is perfectly valid. Ox-headed ghosts belong to Fengdu; these are ox-headed ghosts; therefore Fengdu. What is wrong is the premise, because "ox-headed" was never what they are — it is what Pilgrim said they looked like.
The chapter has now run this move four times. The monks read Tripitaka's robes and inferred a former life. The prefecture read three shining figures and inferred buddhas. Tripitaka read the same figures and bowed. And now Pig reads a description and infers the underworld. Every one of these inferences is reasonable; every one is wrong; and each is wrong in the same way.